Man Confesses to Murdering Etan Patz—Not Convicted!

etan patz In 1979, young Etan Patz was finally allowed to walk to school by himself in New York.  He never made it to school and he vanished without a trace.  Police started a massive search for the boy but couldn’t find Etan or even a body.

In 2012, police arrested Pedro Hernandez after he confessed to his brother-in-law about killing Etan Patz.  In fact, Hernandez confessed to many people, over the years, that he had killed someone.  He told the police the details of how he lured Etan into a store with an offer of candy and a pop and then how Hernandez strangled the boy in the basement of the store.Etan Patz

The Manhattan District Attorney charged Hernandez with murder and kidnapping.  After 18 days of deliberation, the jury told the judge they couldn’t reach a unanimous verdict.  The judge dismissed the case.  See article in New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/10/nyregion/in-the-jury-room-18-days-of-debate-and-disagreement-end-in-a-frustrating-mistrial.html?_r=0

So, a man confesses (many times) to a murder and can’t be convicted—how can this happen?

Here are five reason why:

1.  The passage of so much time.  All evidence (except DNA) deteriorates over time.  This case was 35 years old—making it harder to prove.

2.  The prosecutors didn’t have any other evidence of Etan Patz’s killing: no DNA, fingerprints, or any physical evidence linking Hernandez to the killing.

3.  The defense lawyer told the jury the confessions weren’t reliable or, maybe even truthful.  Hernandez confessed so many times it showed that he was mentally ill and had a low IQ.

4.  In spite of the mental illness, the police questioned Hernandez for 7 hours until he confessed to them about the details of the killing of Etan Patz.

5.  The question for the jury wasn’t “what’s the truth?”  Instead, they had to decide if the prosecutor had provided them with enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hernandez was guilty of murdering Etan Patz.  All 12 jurors had to agree before there could be a conviction.  In this case, they were unable to reach that unanimous verdict.

But here’s my concern:  even though Pedro Hernandez walked away from the Etan Patz murder case, what if his confessions about “killing someone” that he made to family and church members are true?  Who and what is he talking about?  And if true, will he ever be brought to justice??

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , by Colin Nelson. Bookmark the permalink.

About Colin Nelson

Colin T. Nelson worked for 40 years as a prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer in Minneapolis. He tried everything from speeding tickets to first degree murder. His writing about the courtroom and the legal system give the reader a "back door" view of what goes on, what's funny, and what's a good story. He has also traveled extensively and includes those locations in his mysteries. Some are set in Southeast Asia, Ecuador,Peru, and South Africa. Readers get a suspenseful tale while learning about new places on the planet. Colin is married, has two adult children, and plays the saxophone in various bands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *