Why Saudi Arabia Lawsuit Veto-override is Wrong

A congressional majority passed a new law recently allowing 9/11 victims’ families to sue the country of Saudi Arabia for compensation.  President Obama vetoed the bill but congress over-rode the veto and passed the law.  See article in NY Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/us/politics/senate-votes-to-override-obama-veto-on-9-11-victims-bill.html

saudi arabia lawsuit veto over-rideWhy the Saudi Arabia lawsuit veto-override is wrong.

I’m a lawyer but not a diplomat or international lawyer.  Still, there are four obvious, serious problems with this new law.  It was passed because it “sounded good” to the public and the politicians responded to that.  On the surface, it sounds great—the 9/11 victims’ families have a chance to be compensated for their loss.  But there are problems with this.

  1.  The media has exposed most of the terrorists as being Saudi Arabian citizens with some suggestions the government supported them financially.  Even if this is all true, in a lawsuit the victim must prove that the Saudi government caused the terrorists to take their murderous actions.  In reality, it will be extremely tough to prove so the lawsuits will probably not be successful.  But just starting a lawsuit leads to the next problem
  2. It will “open a can of worms.”  Lawsuits in federal court allow the victims great power to investigate the facts of the case and compel the other side to reveal an enormous amount of facts.  This can lead to U.S. citizens getting info about our country’s diplomatic, political, and economic affairs with Saudi Arabia.  It could compromise not only government relations but also private business interests who work in Saudi Arabia.
  3. If there are secret defense agreements between Saudi security forces and our security agencies, a lawsuit could expose these law enforcement activities.  Would that ruin our security protections against future terrorists?  Yes, it could.
  4. It sets-up the U.S. to equal treatment in the world.  Right now, U.S. laws carves out a prohibition in federal court to protect the government of sovereign nations.  In turn, other countries give us equal respect in their courts.  The new law changes that.  How long will it be before hundreds of other countries will pass similar laws—and start filing lawsuits against us?  Just defending thousands of those suits could cost the taxpayers millions of dollars—and remember, those trial will occur in the other country.  Hardly a fair hearing for U.S. interests.  These are some of the reasons why the Saudi Arabia lawsuit veto over-ride is wrong.

What do you think?

About Colin Nelson

Colin T. Nelson worked for 40 years as a prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer in Minneapolis. He tried everything from speeding tickets to first degree murder. His writing about the courtroom and the legal system give the reader a "back door" view of what goes on, what's funny, and what's a good story. He has also traveled extensively and includes those locations in his mysteries. Some are set in Southeast Asia, Ecuador,Peru, and South Africa. Readers get a suspenseful tale while learning about new places on the planet. Colin is married, has two adult children, and plays the saxophone in various bands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *