A fruitful and worthwhile occupation, I guess.

What’s concerning to me is that a young child would look forward to something like this. Whatever happened to becoming star athletes, rock stars, or even sinfully rich?

Where does this come from?

Is it those “evil” video games? Violent movies? The crime on the young man’s street that he views? Or the internet with its easy access to all things twisted and violent?

Speaking to Wolf Blitzer during an interview, Former President Bill Clinton spoke of his concern that the “echo chamber” of the internet created an ominous opportunity for fringe people to get acquainted. Kind of like a cocktail party of violent nuts. He said,

“Some of them are serious,

Some of them are delirious.

Some of them are connected,

Some of them are unhinged.”

With the SUV that just about blew up in Times Square the other day, we’re reminded o fthe threats to Americans from foreign terrorists. The arrested person was originally from Pakistan and had become an American citizen.

But I’m equally concerned with the home-grown terrorists that may be lurking in our own backyard.

While Clinton assured people he believed in the right to protest and even offered to discuss some of the issues with fringe people, he warned that the leaders were responsible for keeping the conversation just that–talk without violence.

Remember the group arrested in Michigan who plotted to kill police? The scariest part for me was that during the officer’s funeral, the group planned to kill even more police.

Do you think we have anything to fear from militant groups, grown in this country? In our history, fringe groups have risen and fallen. Today, the political rhetoric seems to fuel even more violent talk. Will it lead to action?

There’s a famous Supreme Court case defining the limits of free speech. In it, the court posed the following question: If a person is in a crowded theater and yells “fire,” is that an example of free speech that is protected under the constitution? The court said there were limits to free speech, especially when the speech tended to incite dangerous situations.

Is some of the political rhetoric going too far today? When some politicians, in their zeal to defeat their opponents, urge their followers “not to retreat but to reload” and put bulls-eye targets over their pictures, is that “too much?”

Does it lead young people to want to become snipers?

The post I Want to be a Sniper When I Grow Up appeared first on Colin T. Nelson.

Motivated by a religious purpose, they planned to not only kill an officer to start things off, but they’d also bomb the funeral procession for the dead officer. How low can you go?

What’s scary to me is that when people are motivated to act this irrationally for religious reasons, common sense and restraint go out the window. “Jesus wanted us to be ready,” said the militia’s website. Their plan was to cause an anti-government uprising that would usher in the final battle between good and evil and the return of Jesus. In April of 2009, the Department of Homeland Security warned of an increase in these threats of right-wing, homegrown terrorism.

Has this ever happened in the past?

Unfortunately, there’s a long history of this type of terrorism. I can think of two that fit the same plot as the militia in Michigan.

The Charlie Manson gang in Los Angeles in the early 70’s resorted to violence and terrorism by indiscriminately killing two households of people. Their purpose was, “Helter Skelter,” based on the title of a Beatles’ song. To Manson and his faithful followers, their violence would start a race war in which Manson would survive and take over…in some form. Although not religiously motivated, the idea of using local terror to start a larger movement of violence and chaos, matches the militia in Michigan.

Going back even further to 1856, John Brown (the fanatic who led the raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1859), assembled money, a wagon full of weapons, men including a few of his sons, and went to Kansas. Hating slavery, his purpose was to terrorize pro-slavery people in the state. He and his sons, motivated by their religious zeal to stamp out slavery, tortured and massacred several families and escaped back over the border.

But he didn’t stop with just a little terror.

In 1859, again funded by wealthy Northerners and accompanied by a small militia, Brown raided the federal weapons arsenal at Harper’s Ferry, West Virginia, for more arms. His purpose that time was to move into the south and incite an uprising of slaves against their owners. Brown would help by arming the rebelling slaves and fighting alongside of them.

Thanks to this home-grown terrorist, the South decided to secede and the Civil War started. In a creepy sense, Brown got what he wanted after all. Remember the words of the song: “John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the grave, but his soul goes marching on…”

So in this country, we have a long history of militias using terror as a means to spark revolts, often motivated by religious purposes.

What do you think of the warning report from Homeland Security about the increase in 2009 of these kinds of groups? It seems impossible for anyone to spark something very large but when you watch the news and some people’s behavior, I wonder. Even a small act of terrorism could have profound effects on the country by the panic it could cause.

Maybe the soul of John Brown really is still marching on…

The post Michigan Militia Scares Me appeared first on Colin T. Nelson.